The download mentions C2PA as one adequate technical means. Article 50(2) does not name a brand. Use an equivalently robust mark if you pick something else.

Do we label human-edited text?

If a person holds editorial responsibility after human review, the public-interest-text limb of 50(4) does not apply. The 50(2) provider mark may still apply to the generator’s raw output.

AI-generated content labeling snippet

A visible label and a machine-readable hint you can attach to synthetic image, audio, video, or text. The preview is the short label set. The download adds C2PA / attribute notes and the artistic-work variant for Article 50(4). This is a drafting start, not a technical standard.

Educational resource only — not legal advice. scm.cc publishes a readiness report and engineering gap analysis for AI features. It does not give legal advice, represent you before a regulator, or state that a product is ready to ship under any law. This page is educational product guidance, not legal advice. It is not a readiness report, not an engineering gap analysis of your systems, and not a determination that any product meets a legal duty. Confirm current official text before you ship.

Last checked against official sources: 2026-10-11.

When to use this file

You are the provider of a generative system (50(2) mark) and/or the deployer who publishes a deepfake or public-interest text (50(4) visible disclosure). Systems already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 for the 50(2) mark only.

On-page preview

## Visible labels

- Image / video / audio: “AI-generated [image/video/audio].”
- Deepfake of a real person: “This [image/video/audio] was artificially generated or manipulated.”
- Public-interest text: “This text was artificially generated or manipulated.”

## Markup hint

```html
<figure data-ai-generated="true">
  <img src="…" alt="AI-generated image: a product photo of a ceramic mug">
  <figcaption>AI-generated image</figcaption>
</figure>
```

The full download adds C2PA notes, the artistic-work variant, and the 2 December 2026 50(2) transition reminder.

Questions teams ask

Is this C2PA?: The download mentions C2PA as one adequate technical means. Article 50(2) does not name a brand. Use an equivalently robust mark if you pick something else.
Do we label human-edited text?: If a person holds editorial responsibility after human review, the public-interest-text limb of 50(4) does not apply. The 50(2) provider mark may still apply to the generator’s raw output.

Back to the AI law hub

Primary sources

Official text wins. Last checked 2026-10-11. This page is educational product guidance, not legal advice. It is not a readiness report, not an engineering gap analysis of your systems, and not a determination that any product meets a legal duty. Confirm current official text before you ship.